New NERA Study Shows Economic Dangers of a Carbon Tax
A new study by NERA Economic Consulting, prepared for the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), documents the economic dangers of a federal carbon tax. The study is very conservative in its...
View ArticleBoxer-Sanders Carbon “Fee” Relies on Huge Bait-and-Switch
A recent story in EnergyGuardian (sub. req’d) centered on Senator Sheldon Whitehouse’s (D-R.I.) support for the carbon “fee” bill introduced by his colleagues Sen. Barbara Boxer and Sen. Bernie...
View ArticleWhy the “Social Cost of Carbon” Matters
In a previous post, we discussed the recently announced increase in the White House estimate of the “social cost of carbon” (SCC). The SCC refers to the present-value of projected future net damages...
View ArticleNew York: An Energy and Economic Analysis
New York has oil and gas resources, including part of the Marcellus shale formation in the southwestern part of the state, but instead of developing its oil and natural gas resources the state relies...
View ArticleNRDC in damage control mode on the social cost of carbon
The environmental group, NRDC, is engaged in full-scale damage control because they don’t like the fact that the public is learning the truth about the computer models used by the Obama Administration...
View ArticleThe Rest of the Story Part 2: McKitrick on the Elusive “Double Dividend”
Over the summer, the Institute for Energy Research (IER) hosted a conference entitled, “A U.S. Carbon Tax: The Rest of the Story.” We picked experts from both academia and policy analysis to...
View ArticleThe Use of the Social Cost of Carbon, So Far
Since 2009, the Obama Administration has been using the “social cost of carbon” (SCC) in cost-benefit analyses to justify regulations that reduce the use of energy from oil, coal, and natural gas. For...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Boxer-Sanders Carbon “Fee” Relies on Huge Bait-and-Switch
A recent story in EnergyGuardian (sub. req’d) centered on Senator Sheldon Whitehouse’s (D-R.I.) support for the carbon “fee” bill introduced by his colleagues Sen. Barbara Boxer and Sen. Bernie...
View ArticleWhy the “Social Cost of Carbon” Matters
In a previous post, we discussed the recently announced increase in the White House estimate of the “social cost of carbon” (SCC). The SCC refers to the present-value of projected future net damages...
View ArticleClik here to view.
New York: An Energy and Economic Analysis
New York has oil and gas resources, including part of the Marcellus shale formation in the southwestern part of the state, but instead of developing its oil and natural gas resources the state relies...
View ArticleNRDC in damage control mode on the social cost of carbon
The environmental group, NRDC, is engaged in full-scale damage control because they don’t like the fact that the public is learning the truth about the computer models used by the Obama Administration...
View ArticleThe Rest of the Story Part 2: McKitrick on the Elusive “Double Dividend”
Over the summer, the Institute for Energy Research (IER) hosted a conference entitled, “A U.S. Carbon Tax: The Rest of the Story.” We picked experts from both academia and policy analysis to...
View ArticleClik here to view.
The Use of the Social Cost of Carbon, So Far
Since 2009, the Obama Administration has been using the “social cost of carbon” (SCC) in cost-benefit analyses to justify regulations that reduce the use of energy from oil, coal, and natural gas. For...
View ArticleClik here to view.
The Poor and Sick Suffer Under Obama’s Carbon Rule
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claims the finalized “Clean Power Plan” will have climate and health benefits for Americans worth tens of billions of dollars and save thousands of lives per...
View ArticleWhy the “Social Cost of Carbon” Matters
In a previous post, we discussed the recently announced increase in the White House estimate of the “social cost of carbon” (SCC). The SCC refers to the present-value of projected future net damages...
View ArticleClik here to view.
New York: An Energy and Economic Analysis
New York has oil and gas resources, including part of the Marcellus shale formation in the southwestern part of the state, but instead of developing its oil and natural gas resources the state relies...
View ArticleNRDC in damage control mode on the social cost of carbon
The environmental group, NRDC, is engaged in full-scale damage control because they don’t like the fact that the public is learning the truth about the computer models used by the Obama Administration...
View ArticleThe Rest of the Story Part 2: McKitrick on the Elusive “Double Dividend”
Over the summer, the Institute for Energy Research (IER) hosted a conference entitled, “A U.S. Carbon Tax: The Rest of the Story.” We picked experts from both academia and policy analysis to...
View ArticleClik here to view.
The Use of the Social Cost of Carbon, So Far
Since 2009, the Obama Administration has been using the “social cost of carbon” (SCC) in cost-benefit analyses to justify regulations that reduce the use of energy from oil, coal, and natural gas. For...
View ArticleClik here to view.
The Poor and Sick Suffer Under Obama’s Carbon Rule
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claims the finalized “Clean Power Plan” will have climate and health benefits for Americans worth tens of billions of dollars and save thousands of lives per...
View Article
